About
The Mission
The State Law Research Initiative (SLRI) is a legal advocacy organization dedicated to reviving and strengthening state constitutional rights that prevent extremes in our criminal systems, with a focus on excessive prison terms and inhumane conditions of confinement.
State courts are uniquely positioned to reduce over incarceration and the destructive excesses of our criminal legal systems. While America’s mass incarceration crisis is national in scope—directly impacting over 100 million people nationwide—it is largely driven by local policy, as 90% of people in U.S. prisons are confined pursuant to state and local laws. These laws are subject to state constitutions and the individual rights they provide—independent and powerful sources of law that constrain the state’s power to police, prosecute, and punish.
In theory, the federal Bill of Rights imposes limits on state criminal legal systems. But the U.S. Supreme Court has weakened these rights through decades of rulings that empower police, prosecutors, prison officials, and legislatures at the expense of individual rights. While the Court has aggressively enforced certain rights (such as the Second Amendment), it has diluted fundamental liberty protections found in the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments.
To some extent, state courts have been complicit in this federal failure. In the modern era, they have often deferred to and adopted federal law as their own while neglecting the unique text, history, and purpose of their own state constitutions. This is true despite the U.S. Supreme Court’s insistence that its hands-off approach is required, at least in part, by the federalism concerns that arise when a single federal court issues rulings that apply to 50 separate states—a dynamic that does not apply to state supreme courts applying their own state constitutions to state and local laws.
More recently, state constitutionalism has assumed greater prominence in the fights for fair elections, voting rights, reproductive freedom, and a clean and healthy environment. Providing research, briefing, strategy, networking, and communications, SLRI is expanding this movement to criminal legal systems—strengthening state constitutional rights against excessive punishment, and removing them from the shadow of federal law.
SLRI is a fiscally sponsored project of The Proteus Fund.
Who We Are
Kyle C. Barry, Executive Director.
Kyle Barry is the Director of the State Law Research Initiative. Kyle previously served as Senior Counsel at The Justice Collaborative, where he focused on reducing incarceration through local policy reforms to the criminal legal system, and as a Managing Editor at The Appeal. Before that, he was Senior Policy Counsel at the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. and the Director of Justice Programs at Alliance for Justice in Washington, DC, where his advocacy and research focused on judicial nominations, voting rights, and economic justice. Kyle has written extensively on the courts, judges, and civil rights, with reporting and commentary in The Appeal, Bolts Magazine, The New York Times, Slate, The Nation, and Politico, among other outlets. Kyle is a graduate of the University of Vermont and Yale Law School.
Adam Haslett, Chair, Advisory Board.
Adam Haslett is a writer, journalist, and criminal justice policy advocate. He’s twice been a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize and National Book Award for his fiction, has published commentary in The Financial Times, The New Yorker, The Guardian, Der Spiegel, The Nation, and The Atlantic, and been awarded a Guggenheim Fellowship and the Strauss Living Award from the American Academy of Arts & Letters. The founding director of the State Law Research Initiative, he has previously written and worked on policy matters involving prosecutorial misconduct and judicial candidate selection at the state and federal level.
Kristen Bell, Advisor.
Kristen Bell is an Associate Professor and Faculty Director of the Public Service and Policy Program at the University of Oregon School of Law. Her research leverages multiple disciplines to investigate sentencing and parole. In her publications, she explores the normative foundations of parole, conducts empirical analysis of parole decisions, and analyzes state constitutional law regarding parole statutes and mandatory sentencing. Bell is a graduate of Stanford Law School and earned her PhD in philosophy at UNC-Chapel Hill. She clerked for the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, worked as a Soros Justice Fellow, and was a Senior Liman Fellow and Lecturer at Yale Law School.
Dan Meyer, Advisor.
Dan Meyer is the Litigation and Policy Director at Spero Justice Center, a nonprofit law office dedicated to challenging extreme and excessive sentencing practices in Colorado. Dan coordinates Spero’s strategic litigation and legislative advocacy work, which has included multiple campaigns to limit extreme punishments and unjust carceral practices by enforcing the Colorado Constitution. Spero’s areas of focus include curbing life without parole sentencing, the scope of the felony murder doctrine, and the imposition of very lengthy sentences on young people. At Spero, Dan has also been deeply involved in legislative efforts to expand access to medical and elderly parole, pass second look legislation, and create a dedicated resentencing pathway for survivors of severe domestic violence. Prior to joining Spero, Dan attended Harvard Law School and Brown University.